Podcast Review: Death in Ice Valley

I’ve had a month or so of reading non-crime novels but I’m about to attack my backlog this week. However, I haven’t been neglecting crime entirely. Over the last couple of months, I’ve been listening to a podcast called Death in Ice Valley which I’ve found compelling.

On the 29th November, the charred body of a woman was found at the isolated  Isdalen Valley in Bergen. Next to her body were Fenemal sleeping pills, empty bottles and various items of her clothing. There was no identification and the labels from her clothes had been removed. Although investigated by the police, the woman’s identity was never discovered and the autopsy concluded that the woman had died from Fenemal and carbon monoxide poisoning.

I first became aware of the case from crime writing friend, Gunnar Staalesen. Gunnar won the Petrona Award in 2017 for his book, Where Roses Never Die. His Varg Veum books are set in Bergen and I saw him talk about the case at an event. The woman’s death has recently been subject of a podcast by the BBC World Service and NRK, the Norwegian broadcaster. If you enjoy listening to high quality journalism, I can highly recommend it.

The series opens with Norwegian investigative journalist, Marit Higraff, and British BBC radio documentary maker, Neil McCarthy, giving the background to the case. There are some fascinating details:  the pair of rubber boots that the woman bought in Stavanger, the seller remembering that she smelt strongly of garlic, and the suitcase discovered in an Oslo locker which contained, amongst other things, a coded note which has only partially been deciphered. This is what is already known but is fascinating not least because the images are shared in a Facebook group so you can see them for yourselves.

However, the journalists extend the investigation well beyond the original and there are some great potential insights once the woman’s jawbone is located and subjected to modern testing. The predominant theories are that either the woman was a spy, or a prostitute. She carried numerous fake passports but neither scenario fits the facts. As a spy she drew too much attention to herself and her choice of Christian lodgings mean it’s unlikely she took clients back to her rooms. Even her age remains unclear – this is a woman who appears to be without a history.

I can’t give too much else away without completely spoiling the series, and you might want to avoid the Facebook group until you’ve listened to all ten podcasts. Gunnar Staalesen makes an appearance in many of the episodes and suggests a realistic scenario  toward the end of the podcasts. I’m feeling slightly bereft now the episodes have come to an end.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Podcast Review: Death in Ice Valley

  1. I really like it that you reviewed a podcast, Sarah. I think that, more and more, podcasts are going to be a part of the way we experience crime fiction. It’s good to know what’s out there.

  2. Hi Sarah,
    Thanks for the information about this podcast.
    For the past three or so months I’ve been listening to the “Serial” and “Undisclosed” podcasts about a murder in the US. Apparently “Serial” was a worldwide phenomenon when it was released, but I only came across it this year. “Undisclosed” is a much more in depth look at the same case.
    I only have three or four more episodes to go, so “Death in Ice Valley” seems like some good follow up listening for my drive to and from work.

    • Hi – I listened to the first series of Serial and enjoyed it. I’ve just listened to the first series of Someone Knows Something which looks at missing people – I enjoyed it as a whole.

      • Hi Sarah,
        Undisclosed goes deeper into the case covered in Serial and is presented by people in legal professions. Those people have been heavily involved in the process to have the case go to a new trial. Only recently a new trial was ordered.

        They cover the case from a more technical perspective but do so in a very easy to understand way.
        They bring out evidence that shows that the case against Adnan Syed wasn’t always above board, with potential (likely?) police coaching of the main witness in the case, and the withholding of vital information showing that documents used in evidence were used for a purpose for which they were never intended.

        It’s been a long enjoyable and at times disturbing slog to get through the many hours of audio – I now have about three more before I reach the end.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.