Review: Karin Fossum – I Can See in the Dark

Karin Fossum, famous for her novels featuring Detective Inspector Sejer, has written a standalone thriller that defies any ICSitDarkattempts to categorise it. It’s written from the point of view of Riktor, who shows enough self-awareness to pronounce himself a misfit in society both on account of his looks and his solitary nature. But Riktor has a dark secret. In the care home where he works, he secretly inflicts small daily tortures on his elderly patents for his own pleasure. His other recreation is spending time in a local park, watching with a wry eye the comings and goings of its regular visitors.

One day while out in the early morning, we watches a cross country skier accidentally drown in the lake, making no attempt to help the floundering man. He later befriends an alcoholic visitor to the park, enticing him to his house with offers of alcohol. When one of the elderly patients of his care home dies, Riktor is arrested by the police and charged with her murder. But Riktor, innocent of this crime, is now in a dilemma as he is guilty of something  equally terrible.

This a bleak read but written with a deft touch that encourages the reader to stick with an unappealing central character. Riktor is repulsive with no redeeming features but Fossum manages to portray him in a way that we feel his sense of outrage when he is arrested for a crime he didn’t commit. I never totally engaged with him as a character but this is almost certainly deliberate by Fossum. She encourages us to read the book as an outsider looking in which gives the narrative enough pull to make you want to reach the grim conclusion. There’s a bleak humour in the writing that gave I Can See in the Dark a unique feel and, although different from Fossum’s usual fare, I’m sure will still appeal to her fans.

Thanks to Harvill Secker for the review copy. The translation is by James Anderson.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Review: Karin Fossum – I Can See in the Dark

  1. Sarah, I can see why categorising this novel would pose a bit of a problem. I don’t mind reading a book whose main character is an antihero provided there are at least some “redeeming features” about him (or her). The twist in the tale lies in Riktor not having any.

  2. Sarah – Oh, this is a different sort of book to Fossum’s Sejer series. I certainly give her credit for ‘branching out.’ I’ll have to think about whether I’ll read this or not. She does have so much writing talent.

  3. Fossum often has protaganist that suit on the fringes of society. It sounds like this might be another one of those. It probably won’t suit everyone’s taste, but the comments here do put me off a bit.

  4. Pingback: The Best of March’s Reading | crimepieces

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s